En dat niet alleen, zij zal ook tussen de 800.000 en 1,1 miljoen werklozen veroorzaken en de economie kapot maken. Het ziet er naar uit dat de Democraten (de socialisten) deze wet er vandaag door persen. Het komt neer op “economische zelfmoord”.
De Heritage Foundation heeft aangetoond dat voor 2035 (binnen 22 jaar) deze wet er voor gaat zorgen dat onder andere:
–benzineprijzen stijgen met 58 %
–gasprijzen met 55 %
–olieverwarming voor huizen met 56 %
–elektriciteitsprijzen met 90 %
In verhouding zal het Politieke Milieu Avontuur in Nederland en de EU evenredig erge gevolgen hebben.
Lees het artikel van de Heritage Foundation.
-Bestudeer de onderdelen en stuur ingezonden mededelingen naar kranten.
-Stuur ideeen naar de Vrijspreker:
Morning Bell: Waxman-Markey an Energy Tax That Doesn’t Work
Posted By Nick Loris On June 26, 2009 @ 8:42 am In Energy and Environment | 24 Comments
Later today, the House of Representatives is slated to vote on the most convoluted attempt at economic central-planning this nation has ever attempted: cap and trade. The 1,200-plus page Waxman-Markey climate change legislation is nothing more than an energy tax in disguise that by 2035 will raise:
- Gasoline prices by 58 percent
- Natural gas prices by 55 percent
- Home heating oil by 56 percent
- Worst of all, electricity prices by 90 percent
Although proponents of the bill are pointing to grossly underestimated and incorrect costs , the reality is when all the tax impacts have been added up , the average per-family-of-four costs rise by $2,979 per year. In the year 2035 alone, the cost is $4,609. And the costs per family for the whole energy tax aggregated from 2012 to 2035 are $71,493.
But on second thought, cap and trade is much more than that.
It Kills Jobs: Over the 2012-2035 timeline, job losses average over 1.1 million. By 2035, a projected 2.5 million jobs are lost below the baseline (without a cap and trade bill). Particularly hard-hit are sectors of the economy that are very energy-intensive: Manufacturers, farmers, construction, machinery, electrical equipment and appliances, transportation, textiles, paper products, chemicals, plastics and rubbers, and retail trade would face staggering employment losses as a result of Waxman-Markey. It’s worth noting the job losses come after accounting for the green jobs policymakers are so adamant about creating. But don’t worry, because the architects of the bill built in unemployment insurance; too bad it will only help 1.5%  of those losing their jobs from the bill.
It Destroys Our Economy: Just about everything we do and produce uses energy. As energy prices increase, those costs will be passed onto the consumer and reflected in the higher prices we pay for products. Higher energy prices will cause reduced income, less production, and an economy that falls way short of its potential. The average Gross Domestic Product (GDP) lost is $393 billion, hitting a high of $662 billion in 2035. From 2012-2035, the accumulated GDP lost is $9.4 trillion. The negative economic impacts accumulate, and the national debt is no exception. The increase in family-of-four debt, solely because of Waxman-Markey, hits an almost unbelievable $114,915 by 2035.
It Provides Red Meat for Lobbyists: Businesses, knowing very well this would impose a severe cost on their bottom line, sent their lobbyists to Washington to protect them. And it worked.  Most of the allowances (the right to emit carbon dioxide) have been promised to industry, meaning less money will be rebated back to the consumer. Free allowances do not lower the costs of Waxman-Markey; they just shift them around. In other words, everyday Americans are going to be footing the bill. Although the government awarded handouts to businesses, the carbon dioxide reduction targets are still there, and the way they will be met is by raising the price of energy and thereby inflicting more economic pain. Prices have to go up enough to force people to use less energy, and so if anyone is bought off with free allowances, the costs for everyone else are that much higher.
There’s one thing the Waxman-Markey cap and trade bill doesn’t do: Work. All of the above-mentioned costs accrue in the first 25 years of a 90-year program that, as calculated by climatologists, will lower temperatures by only hundredths of a degree  Celsius in 2050 and no more than two-tenths of a degree Celsius at the end of the century. In the name of saving the planet for future generations, Waxman-Markey does not sound like a great deal: millions of lost jobs, trillions of lost income, 50-90 percent higher energy prices, and stunning increases in the national debt, all for undetectable changes in world temperature. Who’s buying that?
- Yesterday, the State Department announced it will resume full diplomatic relations with Venezuela . On Wednesday, the U.S. sent an Ambassador to Syria for the first time since 2005.
- Yesterday, nearly 100,000 North Koreans attended a mass rally against the U.S. as the communist nation vowed to build its nuclear capacity and warned of a “fire shower of nuclear retaliation .”
- Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov signaled that they would not join other nations at the G8 Summit in condemning Iran, calling the protests and violence an “exercise in democracy .”
- President Obama met with a bipartisan group of lawmakers on Thursday on immigration reform , cautioning that nothing should be expected this year.
- ABC News’ Wednesday night special ‘Questions for the President’ struggled for viewers , attracting the lowest number of viewers in its timeslot.
size=1 width=”80%” noshade style=’color:black’ align=center>
Article printed from The Foundry: blog.heritage.org
URL to article: blog.heritage.org
URLs in this post:
 grossly underestimated and incorrect costs: www.heritage.org
 all the tax impacts have been added up: www.heritage.org
 only help 1.5%: blog.heritage.org
 And it worked.: www.heritage.org
 full diplomatic relations with Venezuela: www.latimes.com
 fire shower of nuclear retaliation: www.breitbart.com
 exercise in democracy: uk.reuters.com
 immigration reform: www.nydailynews.com
 struggled for viewers: www.thrfeed.com